• Users Online: 173
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 75

SARS-CoV-2 testing in India: Please mind the gaps


Centre for Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Health Systems Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission16-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance18-May-2021
Date of Web Publication27-Apr-2022

Correspondence Address:
Kanchan Mukherjee
V. N. Purav Marg, Deonar, Mumbai-400088
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_472_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mukherjee K. SARS-CoV-2 testing in India: Please mind the gaps. Int J Prev Med 2022;13:75

How to cite this URL:
Mukherjee K. SARS-CoV-2 testing in India: Please mind the gaps. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 May 24];13:75. Available from: https://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2022/13/1/75/344223



This letter shares insights into the pandemic data situation in India based on a longitudinal study of SARS-CoV-2 testing rates and policy. In the initial phase of the pandemic (which included a 68-day national lockdown period), the testing policy was entirely based on reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) (gold standard). However, during the unlock phase, on June 23, 2020, a rapid antigen test (RAT) with a moderate field sensitivity (50%–60%) was approved for testing. The lockdown period curtailed all non-essential movement of people, whereas subsequent unlock phases allowed movement based on the local situation. However, the virus had already spread before the lockdown started[1] and hence fast, effective testing was critical for the test-isolate-track/treat strategy for infection prevention. Analysis of the testing speed over 1 year shows a 287 times increase in testing rate in the initial 90 days after lockdown was initiated, followed by a steep and steady decline over time after the introduction of RAT in the unlock phase [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Testing speed in equal blocks of time (90 days)

Click here to view


Given the moderate sensitivity of RAT, the testing protocol[2] mandated an RT–PCR test for all symptomatic negative RAT cases to avoid false negatives. Since, the RAT is faster and requires fewer resources, numerous states and union territories have switched to this mode of testing. However, compliance with conducting RT–PCR to rule out false negatives has been low, with six densely populated states reporting less than 50% use of RT–PCR. Hence, virus-infected false negative RAT individuals are being excluded from the case management protocol and are contributing to the spread of COVID-19. These implications are confirmed by the second national serosurveillance study which reports the spread of virus to rural areas and estimates 26–32 infections for every COVID-19 case reported in India.[3]

The slow testing speed and improper implementation of testing protocol using inaccurate RAT are critical gaps in India's response to the pandemic, which need to be urgently addressed. There are solutions available such as locally innovated, fast, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic tests,[4] but the testing policy to date has not incorporated these scientific developments and evidences. These gaps between science, policy, and its implementation are affecting the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 data in India, which has implications for national and global surveillance, international travel policies, and management of this pandemic. Hence, there is an urgent need to address these gaps in the interest of ensuring global health security.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Mukherjee K. COVID-19 and lockdown: Insights from Mumbai. Indian J Public Health 2020;64(Supplement):S168-71.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). Advisory. Newer Additional Strategies for COVID-19 Testing. June 23, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Murhekar MV, Bhatnagar T, Selvaraju S, Saravanakumar V, Thangaraj JWV, Shah N, et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in India, August-September, 2020: Findings from the second nationwide household serosurvey. Lancet Glob Health 2021;9:e257-66.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mukherjee K. Integrating technology, innovation and policy: COVID-19 and HTA. Health Policy Technol 2021;10:16-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed60    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]