|
 
 |
| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 12
| Issue : 1 | Page : 170 |
|
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in 2019 novel Coronavirus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Marzieh Esmaeili1, Fatemeh Abdi2, Gita Shafiee3, Hamid Asayesh4, Zahra Esmaeili Abdar5, Fereshteh Baygi6, Mostafa Qorbani7
1 Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
3 Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Medical Emergencies, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
5 Dietary Supplements and Probiotic Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
6 Center of Maritime Health and Society, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
7 Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj; Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| Date of Submission | 17-Aug-2020 |
| Date of Acceptance | 21-Jan-2021 |
| Date of Web Publication | 14-Dec-2021 |
Correspondence Address:
Mostafa Qorbani
Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_484_20
Background: Evidence showed that partial or complete loss of smell and taste might be a possible primary symptom of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). This study aimed to systematically review and pool all available evidence on the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this systematic review, a comprehensive search was carried out systematically through e-databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS); that was limited to English-language studies published from 2019 up to 6th May 2020. Afterward, all studies reported the taste and smell dysfunction in the COVID-19 patients were included. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The pooled prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction was estimated using the random effects meta-analysis method. Results: Among 28 eligible included studies in this systematic review, finally, 22 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. According to the random effect meta-analysis, the global pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of any olfactory dysfunction, anosmia, and hyposmia was 55% (40%-70%), 40% (22%-57%), and 40% (20%-61%) respectively. The pooled estimated prevalence of any gustatory dysfunction, ageusia, and dysgeusia was 41% (23%-59%), 31% (3%-59%), and 34% (19%-48%) respectively. Conclusions: Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction is prevalent among COVID-19 patients. Therefore, olfactory and gustatory dysfunction seems to be part of important symptoms and notify for the diagnosis of COVID-19, especially in the early phase of the infection.
Keywords: Ageusia, anosmia, COVID-19, sensation disorder, taste, and smell impairment
How to cite this article:
Esmaeili M, Abdi F, Shafiee G, Asayesh H, Abdar ZE, Baygi F, Qorbani M. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in 2019 novel Coronavirus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med 2021;12:170 |
How to cite this URL:
Esmaeili M, Abdi F, Shafiee G, Asayesh H, Abdar ZE, Baygi F, Qorbani M. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in 2019 novel Coronavirus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 30];12:170. Available from: https://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2021/12/1/170/332547 |
| Background | |  |
In 2019, a new viral pandemic disease began from East Asia and rapidly spread to the world.[1] The World Health Organization (WHO) named this disease COVID-19, determined by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).[2] There were 3,855,788 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 265,862 deaths globally at the time of the writing of this article.[3]
Due to the newly known COVID-19, it is expected that different aspects of the disease will be described daily.[4] The common symptoms of this disease are fever (98%), dry cough (76%), dyspnea (55%), and fatigue/myalgia (44%). Also, lab findings and lung CT abnormalities can help to identify COVID-19.[5],[6],[7] In the moderate to severe infection, several organs and systems can be affected, included respiratory, cardiovascular, hematologic, immune systems, kidney, liver, and even skin.[8],[9],[10] However, recent reports showed an association between COVID-19 and various neurologic manifestations that involved central and peripheral nervous system (CNS & PNS). A study in China reported that 36.4% of patients with severe infection had neurologic signs.[11] Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction as peripheral nervous system manifestations has been reported in previous studies.[12],[13] However, the main pathogenesis is unclear; it seems that epithelial impairment and CNS involvement after the respiratory tract infection with coronaviruses have been presented.[14] Numerous reports from Germany, Iran, Italy, and the US have been shown that anosmia occurs in 34% to 68% of COVID-19 positive patients.[15],[16],[17],[18],[19] Evidence showed that partial or complete loss of smell and taste might be a possible primary symptom of the infection even in mild cases would not meet the criteria for testing and therefore they are carriers.[1] The current systematic review and meta-analysis[20] with limited studies showed that olfactory and gustatory dysfunction is common symptom in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, the smell and taste impairment may be an important symptom of infection and a significant factor of COVID-19 carriers.
The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the all available evidences on the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. The secondary aim of this review was to perform an update meta-analysis to pool the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.
| Methods | | |
This study is outlined based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.[21],[22]
Eligibility criteria
The inclusion criteria were considered for selection of studies with respect to the review's purposes; they are as follows:
- Published in the English language
- Full-text available
- Reported the prevalence of olfactory and taste disorders related to the positive COVID-19 patients.
Information sources and Search strategy
To acquire the relevant studies, four e-databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) were systematically searched. The search strategy comprising of two concepts, the 2019 novel coronavirus disease and the sense of smell and taste, was designed by two authors (M.E. & M.Q.). Moreover, the results were limited to the English-language research articles published from 2019 up to 6th May 2020. The building process of the search query in PubMed with the keywords and their synonyms are represented in [Table 1]. A similar search query was taken for other databases based on their facilities.
Study selection
The EndNote reference management software was applied to manage the acquired articles. At first, removing duplicate articles was done through the software and also checked manually. Then, in the screening phase, the title and abstract of the studies were examined with respect to the including criteria. Afterward, if needed the full texts were screened in details. The selection process was done independently by two authors (M.E. & M.Q.). They came to an agreement about the conflicting results.
Quality assessment
The methodological quality of the included studies in this review was conducted by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).[23],[24] The quality assessment was conducted independently by two authors (M.E. & M.Q.). The MMAT was developed to appraise different empirical studies that categorized in five categories including qualitative, randomized controlled trial, nonrandomized, quantitative descriptive and mixed methods studies. This tool consists of 5 items for each category - each of which could be marked as Yes, No, or Can't tell. Based on the scoring system, the score 1 assigns to Yes and the score 0 to all other answers. In other words, the total score would be the percentage of affirmative responses. To evaluate the final scores qualitatively, scores above half (more than 50%) are considered as high quality.
Statistical analysis
Qualitative synthesis (meta-analysis) was performed to pool the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Cochrane Q test and I square statistics were used to assess the heterogeneity of reported prevalence among the studies. A value of P < 0. 1 was regarded as statistically significant for heterogeneity assessment. Due to severe heterogeneity among studies regarding reported prevalence, the pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effect meta-analysis proposed by Der-Simonian and Laird method. Subgroup meta-analysis was performed according to study design (case-control/cross-sectional) and measurement method of olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction (questionnaire, medical records, and test). Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the effect of study covariates, including the quality score, measurement tool. To assess the effect of each study on over-all prevalence, we performed sensitivity analyses by sequentially removing each study and rerunning the analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software, V.11.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).
| Results | | |
| Search results | | |
The systematic search resulted in 160 potentially relevant articles. They were obtained from four e-databases including PubMed (65), EMBASE (41), Scopus (43), and WoS (11). After leaving out 84 duplicated studies, the titles and abstracts of the rest were examined, if needed their full texts were also checked. Hence, during the screening process, 56 studies did not meet the eligibility criteria and one study was excluded due to inaccessibility to the full text. Afterward, the reference list of related studies was examined for finding the other studies. Finally, 28 articles were included in qualitative review; then in quantitative review six studies were excluded due to reporting the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients with sudden loss of smell (SLS) (5 studies) or individuals with olfactory and gustatory dysfunction without known COVID-19 status. The searching and selecting process is shown in the PRISMA diagram, [Figure 1]. Characteristics of the 28 selected studies including study characteristics, outcome characteristics, findings, and quality score are shown in [Table 2].
Quality assessment
The included studies consist of a variety of study designs - cross-sectional (n = 22);[11],[12],[16],[17],[18],[19],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40] case-control (n = 3);[41],[42],[43] case-report and case series (n = 3) studies.[44],[45],[46] Two categories of the MMAT were employed based on the study design to examine the methodological quality of these studies; quantitative non-randomized category for cross-sectional and case-control studies and quantitative descriptive category for case-report and case series ones. Of the 28 included studies, one[43] had a MMAT score of 100%, six.[19],[26],[27],[38],[41],[42] scored 80%, three[44],[45],[46] scored 40% and the rest[11],[12],[16],[17],[18],[25],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[39],[40] had a MMAT score of 60%, [Table 2]. The most frequent shortcomings in the quality assessment were an inappropriate or not-reported method for measuring exposures and controlling confounders [Appendix 1 - [Table 1] and [Table 2]].
Qualitative synthesis
The characteristics of the eligible studies are summarized in [Table 2]. All 28 included studies in this review were investigated the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction during the COVID-19 outbreak, from January till April 2020. Most of these studies (about 61%, 17/28)[12],[16],[18],[26],[27],[30],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[41],[42],[44],[46] were carried out in the European countries including Italy (5), Germany (3), UK (2), Belgium (1), France (1), Spain (1), the Netherlands (1), and three joint studies; and also in several Asian countries (about 25%, 7/28)[11],[17],[28],[32],[39],[43],[45] including Iran (3), Singapore (1), China (1), South Korea (1), and Israel (1); and in the USA (about 11%, 3/28);[19],[29],[40] and one study[31] was conducted in European and American countries jointly.
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction measurement
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction was measured using different methods. The most common method was the self-report. Self- report could be done through different ways: an online questionnaire,[12],[19],[27],[30],[34],[37] non-online questionnaire,[18],[32],[35],[39],[42],[43] online checklist,[17] the COVID RADAR Symptom Tracker app,[16] visual analogue scale (VAS),[25] archived medical records,[11],[40] or verbally.[44],[45] Four studies[28],[29],[31],[33] did not report how to measure, just extracted from medical records. In three studies,[26],[27],[41] the Sniffin' Sticks screening test for smelling disorders was used to perform psychophysical olfactory evaluation. The other methods contain: The SNOT-22 test to grade symptom severity,[27],[36] the CCCRC test to assess Olfactory function,[38] and the supra-threshold six odors smell test.[46]
Epidemiological characteristics of included studies
Of the 28 eligible studies, 22 reported the prevalence of the olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction in the COVID-19 patients, five studies described the olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction in the COVID-19 patients with SLS[26],[27],[44],[45],[46] and one study ecologically assessed the correlation between the number of subjects with olfactory dysfunction and the number of confirmed COVID-19 patients in all provinces of Iran.[17] They were different in design and settings. Majority study design was cross-sectional (about 79%, 22/28);[11],[12],[16],[17],[18],[19],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40] then case-control (about 11%, 3/25)[41],[42],[43] and three case report and case series (about 11%, 3/28).[44],[45],[46] The sample size of them except case report and case series, ranged from 16[29] to 10069.[17]
Regardless of the case report and case series studies: the sample size ranged from 16[29] to 10069;[17] the prevalence of the olfactory dysfunction reported by 88% (22/25); the taste disorder reported by 60% (15/25); the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction reported by 44% (11/25); olfactory or gustatory dysfunction reported by 8% (2/25). The presented olfactory or gustatory dysfunction prevalence in Italy[36] and Singapore[39] were 64.3% and 22.7% respectively; while the presented olfactory and gustatory dysfunction prevalence ranged from 16.6% to 80.8%.
The highest reported prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in European, Asian countries, and the USA were 85.7%,[27] 98%,[43] 67.7%[19] respectively; and also the highest occurred prevalence of gustatory dysfunction in European, Asian countries, and the USA were 88.8%,[12] 33.7%,[32] 71.1%[19] respectively.
Quantitative synthesis
Results of meta-analysis
The results of meta-analysis of the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction according to study design, measurement tool and dysfunction type are shown in [Table 3]. The total sample size of the included studies in meta-analysis was 4322. The eligible studies for estimation of the prevalence of any olfactory dysfunction, anosmia and hyposmia were 19, 13, and 7, respectively. According to the random effect meta-analysis, the global pooled prevalence (95% CI) of any olfactory dysfunction, anosmia and hyposmia was 55% (40%-70%), 40% (22%-57%) and 40% (20%-61%) respectively. Appendix 2 - [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3] show the forest plot of eligible studies for the estimation of olfactory dysfunction, anosmia and hyposmia prevalence. Prevalence (95% CI) of olfactory dysfunction in the case control studies (prevalence: 97%; 95% CI: 94-100) was significantly higher than the cross-sectional studies (prevalence: 51%; 95% CI: 35-66). | Table 3: Meta-analysis of the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory impairments according to study design, measurement tool and impairment type
Click here to view |
The included studies to estimate the prevalence of any gustatory dysfunction, ageusia and dysgeusia were 14 (n = 2878), 7 (n = 762), and 7 (n = 845) respectively. The pooled estimated prevalence of any gustatory dysfunction, ageusia and dysgeusia was 41% (95% CI: 23%-59%), 31% (95% CI: 3%-59%) and 34% (95% CI: 19%-48%) respectively. Combination of olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction prevalence was reported in 13 studies (n = 1934) demonstrating 42% (95% CI: 29%-55%) prevalence in patients with COVID-19. Appendix 2 - [Figure 4] and [Figure 6] show the forest plot of the prevalence of any gustatory dysfunction, ageusia dysgusia in patients with COVID-19.
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of each individual study on pooled prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. The results showed that no significant change in the pooled prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction was found in the included studies (P > 0.05).
Meta-regression
Results of meta-regression analysis demonstrated that effect of quality score, study design and measurement tool on reported prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
| Discussion | | |
The presented study systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate all available evidence on the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in the COVID-19 patients as well as to perform an updated meta-analysis to pool the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in them. Of the 28 included studies, five studies described the olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients with SLS and one study ecologically assessed the correlation between the number of subjects with olfactory dysfunction and the number of confirmed COVID-19 patients in all provinces of Iran.
In the current updated meta-analysis, the global pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of any olfactory dysfunction, anosmia and hyposmia was 55%, 40% and 40% respectively. Also, the pooled estimated prevalence of any gustatory dysfunction, ageusia and dysgeusia was 41%, 31% and 34% respectively. These findings were concordant with previous meta-analysis by Tong et al.[20] Previous meta-analysis with ten included studies showed that prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction was 52.73% (95% CI, 29.64%-75.23%) and 43.93% (95% CI, 20.46%-68.95%) among patients with COVID-19.
As expected from initial observations in the world, COVID-19 patients presented with anosmia and ageusia among other clinical features. This was consistently found in this meta-analysis study. The result of our study suggested that olfactory dysfunction was prevalent in approximately 55% of the patients; and taste dysfunction were present in approximately 40%, of the cases, respectively. In various studies, it has been observed that a relative decrease of sense of smell/taste in the early stages of COVID-19 infection occurs in patients with COVID -19 and it is considered as one of the clinical signs of the noted virus.[19] Since the initial reports from China, international reports on COVID-19 patients have been growing, representing a 5% to 85% range of loss of smell sense.[47] In a study on 59 patients with COVID-19 in Italy, 34% of patients reported impaired sense of smell or taste and 19% of them conveyed an impairment of both senses.[18]
Considering, an increasing number of COVID-19 patients stated sudden loss of smell and taste, therefore it is likely that anosmia and ageusia are associated in patients with COVID-19.[48],[49] It has been reported that more than a third of patients with COVID-19 have experienced neurological symptoms such as involvement of the central and peripheral nervous system. The most common complaints in patients with clinical manifestations of problems in the peripheral nervous system were the impairment of taste and smell.[50]
In the qualitative synthesis, the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction prevalence ranged variously from 16.6% to 80.8%. According to a study which has been the outcome of knowledge synthesis of 100 million biomedical documents, it was perceived that cells of keratinocytes of the tongue and olfactory epithelial cells were likely to be less important targets for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This is related to reports of loss of sense of smell and taste as primary indicators of COVID-19 infection in asymptomatic patients. In an animal model in which the immune system was suppressed by the SARS-CoV infection, a slight degeneration of the olfactory epithelium was observed. These observations are associated with the emerging reports of anosmia/hyposmia in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients from South Korea and other countries.[51] The researchers also found in a genetic study on mice and humans that the olfactory neurons in the two main genes involved in SARS-CoV-2 were not represented. As a result, SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to anosmia and other forms of olfactory dysfunction.[52]
In our results, two studies investigated the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the individuals with unknown COVID-19 status.[17],[31] It should be noted, dysfunction in the sense of smell and taste can also be a sign of other pulmonary infections. Therefore, more research is needed to find answers to questions as well as doubts. Although, the World Health Organization has not yet situated the two symptoms on Corona's list of symptoms, however, it has presented that a disorder in these two senses, along with other symptoms not independently, could provide useful information for identifying patients with COVID-19.
It should be noted that physicians around the world have reported some patients who suddenly lost their sense of taste and smell. It is noteworthy that the detection of the cause of the loss of these senses is crucial in supporting the diagnosis of this disease. Lee et al. (2020) in survey of 3191 patients in Korea showed anosmia or ageusia in 15% patients in the early stage of COVID-19 and in 16% patients with asymptomatic-to-mild disease severity.[53] Also, a recent study reported almost one-fifth of the patients presented the symptoms before the hospital admission.[18] Impairment of mucosal epithelial cells of the oral cavity may define ageusia discovered in the early stage of COVID-19. This evidence may describe the pathogenetic mechanism underlying Olfactory or taste disorders in COVID-19.[54] Since the initial reports from China, international reports on COVID-19 patients have been growing, representing a 5% to 85% range of loss of smell sense.[47] In sum, these findings may influence future diagnosis and prevention of COVID-19. It should consider whether isolated disorders of smell/taste are an ample basis for COVID-19 testing or isolation to restriction spread of the virus.
| Conclusion | | |
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction is prevalent among COVID-19 patients. As a result, olfactory and gustatory dysfunction seems to be part of important symptoms and notify for the diagnosis of COVID-19, especially in the early phase of the infection. It is suggested that assessment of sense of smell and taste is considered in screening suspected individuals referred to health care centers.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Alborz University of Medical Sciences (ABZUMS).
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| Appendix 1 | | |
| Appendix 2 | | |
| References | | |
| 1. | Wang Z, Yang B, Li Q, Wen L, Zhang R. Clinical features of 69 cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:769-77.  |
| 2. | Zhou P, Yang X-L, Wang X-G, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020;579:270-3. |
| 3. | |
| 4. | Li G, De Clercq E. Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020;19:149-50. |
| 5. | Kim ES, Chin BS, Kang CK, Kim NJ, Kang YM, Choi JP, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: A preliminary report of the first 28 patients from the Korean cohort study on COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e142. |
| 6. | Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, James A, Taylor J, Spicer K, et al. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility—King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:377-81. |
| 7. | Lovato A, Rossettini G, de Filippis C. Sore throat in COVID-19: Comment on “Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A single arm meta-analysis”. J Med Virol 2020;92:714-5. |
| 8. | Choong MC, Cheong EH, Kalimuddin S, Wen SW, Phua GC, et al. Rapid progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: Review of current understanding of critical illness from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Ann Acad Med Singap 2020;49:108-18. |
| 9. | Geng YJ, Wei ZY, Qian HY, Huang J, Lodato R, Castriotta RJ. Pathophysiological characteristics and therapeutic approaches for pulmonary injury and cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019. Cardiovasc Pathol 2020;47:107228. |
| 10. | Omrani-Nava V, Maleki I, Ahmadi A, Moosazadeh M, Hedayatizadeh-Omran A, Roozbeh F, et al. Evaluation of hepatic enzymes changes and association with prognosis in COVID-19 patients. H epat Mon 2020; 20. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon. |
| 11. | Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:683-90. |
| 12. | Lechien JR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, De Siati DR, Horoi M, Le Bon SD, Rodriguez A, et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A multicenter European study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:2251-61. |
| 13. | Keyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B. Dysosmia and dysgeusia due to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus; a hypothesis that needs further investigation. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;42:9. |
| 14. | Hummel T, Landis BN, Hüttenbrink K-B. Smell and taste disorders. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;10:Doc04. |
| 15. | Lüers J, Klußmann J, Guntinas-Lichius O. The Covid-19 pandemic and otolaryngology: What it comes down to?. Laryngorhinootologie 2020;99:287-91. |
| 16. | Menni C, Valdes A, Freydin MB, Ganesh S, El-Sayed Moustafa J, Visconti A, et al. Loss of smell and taste in combination with other symptoms is a strong predictor of COVID-19 infection. Nat Med 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.05.20048421. |
| 17. | Bagheri SHR, Asghari AM, Farhadi M, Shamshiri AR, Kabir A, Kamrava SK, et al. Coincidence of COVID-19 epidemic and olfactory dysfunction outbreak in Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2020;34:62. |
| 18. | Giacomelli A, Pezzati L, Conti F, Bernacchia D, Siano M, Oreni L, et al. Self-reported olfactory and taste disorders in SARS-CoV-2 patients: A cross-sectional study. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:889-90. |
| 19. | Yan CH, Faraji F, Prajapati DP, Boone CE, DeConde AS. Association of chemosensory dysfunction and Covid-19 in patients presenting with influenza-like symptoms. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:806-13. |
| 20. | Tong JY, Wong A, Zhu D, Fastenberg JH, Tham T. The prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163:3-11. |
| 21. | Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. |
| 22. | Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;350:g7647. |
| 23. | Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inform 2018;34:285-91. |
| 24. | Hong QN, Gonzalez-Reyes A, Pluye P. Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). J Eval Clin Pract 2018;24:459-67. |
| 25. | Haehner A, Draf J, Draeger S, de With K, Hummel T. Predictive value of sudden olfactory loss in the diagnosis of COVID-19. RL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2020;82:175-80. |
| 26. | Lechien J, Cabaraux P, Chiesa-Estomba C, Khalife M, Plzak J, Hans S, et al. Objective olfactory testing in patients presenting with sudden onset olfactory dysfunction as the first manifestation of confirmed COVID-19 infection. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.15.20066472. |
| 27. | Lechien JR, saussez S, Cabaraux P, Hans S, Khalife M, Martiny D, Chiesa C. Psychophysical olfactory findings of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients: Preliminary report. medRxiv 2020. doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.02.2007058. |
| 28. | Levinson R, Elbaz M, Ben-Ami R, Shasha D, Levinson T, Choshen G, et al. Anosmia and dysgeusia in patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infect Dis (Lond) 2020;52:600-2. |
| 29. | Aggarwal S, Garcia-Telles N, Aggarwal G, Lavie C, Lippi G, Henry BM. Clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Early report from the United States. Diagnosis (Berl) 2020;7:91-6. |
| 30. | Benezit F, Le Turnier P, Declerck C, Paille C, Revest M, Dubee V, et al. Utility of hyposmia and hypogeusia for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:1014-5. |
| 31. | Kaye R, Chang CWD, Kazahaya K, Brereton J, Denneny JC, 3 rd. COVID-19 anosmia reporting tool: Initial findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163:132-4. |
| 32. | Kim GU, Kim MJ, Ra SH, Lee J, Bae S, Jung J, et al. Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with mild COVID-19. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:948.e1-3. |
| 33. | Klopfenstein T, Kadiane-Oussou NJ, Toko L, Royer PY, Lepiller Q, Gendrin V, et al. Features of anosmia in COVID-19. Med Mal Infect 2020;50:436-9. |
| 34. | Lechien JR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Place S, Van Laethem Y, Cabaraux P, Mat Q, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 1,420 European patients with mild-to-moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Intern Med 2020;288:335-44. |
| 35. | Luers JC, Rokohl AC, Loreck N, Wawer Matos PA, Augustin M, Dewald F, et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2262-4. |
| 36. | Spinato G, Fabbris C, Polesel J, Cazzador D, Borsetto D, Hopkins C, et al. Alterations in smell or taste in mildly symptomatic outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA 2020;323:2089-90. |
| 37. | Tostmann A, Bradley J, Bousema T, Yiek WK, Holwerda M, Bleeker-Rovers C, et al. Strong associations and moderate predictive value of early symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 test positivity among healthcare workers, the Netherlands, March 2020. Euro Surveill 2020;25:2000508. |
| 38. | Vaira LA, Deiana G, Fois AG, Pirina P, Madeddu G, De Vito A, et al. Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients: Single-center experience on 72 cases. Head Neck 2020;42:1252-8. |
| 39. | Wee LE, Chan YFZ, Teo NWY, Cherng BPZ, Thien SY, Wong HM, et al. The role of self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunction as a screening criterion for suspected COVID-19. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:2389-90. |
| 40. | Yan CH, Faraji F, Prajapati DP, Ostrander BT, DeConde AS. Self-reported olfactory loss associates with outpatient clinical course in Covid-19. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:821-31. |
| 41. | Hornuss D, Lange B, Schroeter N, Rieg S, Kern WV, Wagner D. Anosmia in COVID-19 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:1426-7. |
| 42. | Beltran-Corbellini A, Chico-Garcia JL, Martinez-Poles J, Rodriguez-Jorge F, Natera-Villalba E, Gomez-Corral J, et al. Acute-onset smell and taste disorders in the context of Covid-19: A pilot multicenter PCR-based case-control study. Eur J Neurol 2020;27:1738-41. |
| 43. | Moein ST, Hashemian SMR, Mansourafshar B, Khorram-Tousi A, Tabarsi P, Doty RL. Smell dysfunction: A biomarker for COVID-19. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:944-50. |
| 44. | Gane SB, Kelly C, Hopkins C. Isolated sudden onset anosmia in COVID-19 infection. A novel syndrome. Rhinology 2020;58:299-301. |
| 45. | Gilani S, Roditi R, Naraghi M. COVID-19 and anosmia in Tehran, Iran. Med Hypotheses 2020;141:109757. |
| 46. | Marchese-Ragona R, Ottaviano G, Nicolai P, Vianello A, Carecchio M. Sudden hyposmia as a prevalent symptom of COVID-19 infection. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.06.20045393. |
| 47. | Izquierdo-Dominguez A, Rojas-Lechuga MJ, Mullol J, Alobid I. Olfactory dysfunction in the COVID-19 outbreak. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2020;30:317-26. |
| 48. | Wu Y, Xu X, Chen Z, Duan J, Hashimoto K, Yang L, et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun 2020;87:18-22. |
| 49. | |
| 50. | Jin H, Hong C, Chen S, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Mao L, et al. Consensus for prevention and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for neurologists. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2020;5:146-51. |
| 51. | Venkatakrishnan A, Puranik A, Anand A, Zemmour D, Yao X, Wu X, et al. Knowledge synthesis from 100 million biomedical documents augments the deep expression profiling of coronavirus receptors. Elife 2020;9:e58040. |
| 52. | Brann D, Tsukahara T, Weinreb C, Logan DW, Datta SR. Non-neural expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory epithelium suggests mechanisms underlying anosmia in COVID-19 patients. Sci Adv 2020;6:eabc5801. |
| 53. | Lee Y, Min P, Lee S, Kim SW. Prevalence and duration of acute loss of smell or taste in COVID-19 patients. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e174. |
| 54. | Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, Peng J, Dan H, Zeng X, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12:8. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|
Search Pubmed for