• Users Online: 807
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 115

Non-adherence to pain medication increases risk of postoperative frozen shoulder


1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Baden, Im Ergel 1, Baden, Switzerland
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, Aarau, Switzerland
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spital Bülach, Bülach, Switzerland

Date of Submission26-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance01-Apr-2021
Date of Web Publication21-Sep-2021

Correspondence Address:
Richard Niehaus
Kantonsspital Baden
Switzerland
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_499_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Postoperative frozen shoulder (FS) or adhesive capsulitis is a relatively frequent complication (5-20%), even after simple arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. The pathophysiology is still unclear, but psychological factors may play a pivotal role. From clinical experience, we hypothesized that patients, who are reluctant to take medications, particularly “pain-killers,” have an increased incidence of postoperative FS. Methods: We identified twenty patients who underwent limited arthroscopic operations of the shoulder and developed postoperative FS. Twenty patients with matching type of surgery, age, and gender served as control group (n = 20). All patients were at least one year postoperative and asymptomatic at the time of examination. Demographic data, the patient's adherence to self-medication (including self-medicating scale, SMS), development the Quality of life (QoL), and depression scale (PHQ-4-questionnaire) were assessed. Results: Patients with FS had a 2-fold longer rehabilitation and 3-fold longer work inability compared to the patients without FS (P < 0.009 and P < 0.003, respectively). Subjective shoulder value SSV (P = 0.075) and post-operative improvement of QoL (P = 0.292) did not differ among the groups. There was a trend—but not significant—toward less coherence to self-medication in the FS-group (26.50 vs. 29.50; P = 0.094). Patients with postoperative FS significantly more often stated not to have “taken pain-killers as prescribed” (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Patients reporting unwillingness to take the prescribed pain medications had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative FS. It remains unclear whether the increased risk of developing FS is due to reduced postoperative analgesia or a critical attitude toward taking medication. However, patients who are reluctant to take painkillers should strongly be encouraged to take medications as prescribed.

Keywords: Adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder, painkillers, post-operative adherence, shoulder arthroscopy


How to cite this article:
Niehaus R, Urbanschitz L, Schumann J, Lenz CG, Frank FA, Ehrendorfer S, Eid K. Non-adherence to pain medication increases risk of postoperative frozen shoulder. Int J Prev Med 2021;12:115

How to cite this URL:
Niehaus R, Urbanschitz L, Schumann J, Lenz CG, Frank FA, Ehrendorfer S, Eid K. Non-adherence to pain medication increases risk of postoperative frozen shoulder. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 2];12:115. Available from: https://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2021/12/1/115/326303




  Introduction Top


Frozen shoulder (FS), also known as adhesive capsulitis,[1],[2],[3] is a condition characterized by stiffness and pain in the shoulder joint and affects about 2-5% of the general population.[4] By consensus, a distinction is made between primary FS (idiopathic) and secondary FS.[5] While idiopathic FS is characterized by an insidious onset, secondary FS is either associated with a systemic disease (i.e., diabetes, cardiovascular or oncologic disease, hypothyroidism, etc.) or follows a defined event—such as a trauma or shoulder surgery.

The latter condition may even occur after limited or simple arthroscopic shoulder surgery[6] and lead to a largely prolonged rehabilitation. The postoperative course in these patients distinctively differs from a normal postoperatively restricted motion in that patients show signs of massive inflammatory pain and decreased external rotation in adduction. Not infrequently, these patients have a normal course in the first days and experience a sudden deterioration of pain and range of motion.

Since small arthroscopic shoulder interventions are frequently performed, this complication imposes a relevant burden on the healthcare system due to (unexpectedly) long inability to work.[7] Identification of patients a risk, besides the ones known for idiopathic FS, would be advantageous to apply prophylactic measures and to improve preoperative information on possible duration of inability to work.

Several studies have demonstrated that a patient's psychological predisposition has a pivotal effect on postoperative outcome after shoulder surgeries.[8],[9] However, there is no literature, whether psychological characteristics may also favor development of a postoperative FS. In particular, from our own personal observation, patients with primary or secondary FS have often a very critical attitude toward intake of any medication. We hypothesized that patients who develop postoperative FS had a different psychological predisposition, in particular a critical attitude toward intake of medications compared to those who did not develop a FS.


  Methods Top


We retrospectively identified 1,022 patients who had undergone a limited shoulder arthroscopy between January 2013 and December 2018 using our clinical information system. The following were defined as limited invasive or small arthroscopic surgeries: Tenotomy of the long head of the biceps, subacromial debridement of calcific deposits or a small (1 cm) rotator cuff repair with maximum utilizing one suture-anchor. All operations were performed by the same board-certified orthopedic surgeon.

Postoperative treatment protocol included immediate passive and actively assisted motion exercises without limitation, but within pain tolerance. Postoperatively, patients were immobilized in a sling for 2-3 weeks and were allowed to move their shoulder actively without resistance. After 6 weeks, slight strengthening exercises were begun. Patients were followed in the outpatient clinic at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

The postoperative pain prescription was based upon the analgesic ladder recommended by the WHO.[10] The base medication was paracetamol 4 × 1 gram per day and ibuprofen 2 × 600 milligram per day and -if necessary- an opioid reserve. Patients were advised to take the medication for at least 3 weeks after surgery before beginning careful reduction.

Patients were included in the study if they developed a postoperative FS at least a year ago and were asymptomatic at the time of data collection. Diagnosis of FS was made using the definition by the British Shoulder and Elbow Society. It includes the painful restriction of shoulder motion with a flexion limited to 100° and a reduced external rotation in adduction of more than 30 degrees compared to the non-operated shoulder.[6],[8],[11],[12]

From the retrospectively determined patient group with FS, a patient cohort without FS was selected that matched as closely as possible with the type of surgery, age, and gender.

A self-developed four-part-questionnaire was used to evaluate the compliance with prescribed medication, the subjective shoulder outcome and the depression level by telephone interview. The surveys were carried out after receiving the written informed consent.

Part 1: A self-developed questionnaire (in German) with demographic aspects.

To assess postoperative restriction of shoulder function, a modification of the SF-36 questionnaire[13] was utilized: “How long do you had any problems with your work or other regular daily activities postoperatively.” Answers were given in months and termed as “restricted months” in the result section.

In addition, we asked the following dichotomous questions about quality-of-life (Qol): “Would you have the same surgery done again?”; “Did the surgery improve your quality of life?”; “Did you take painkillers as prescribed postoperatively?” (key-question).

Part 2: The subjective shoulder value (SSV) described by Gerber and Gilbart[14] was used to define patient's subjective shoulder assessment, expressed as a percentage of a perfectly normal shoulder reaching a 100 percent.

Part 3: A German translation of the self-medication scale (SMS, Tab 1) by James and French[15] was used, which is validated to reflect patient's adherence to medication. The patients answered nine Likert-scaled questions, which are rated with one to five points (total score at least 9, maximum 45 points). A high score indicates a greater adherence to self-medication [Table 1].
Table 1: The Self-medicating-scale (SMS) - presentation of the used questionnaire. Scores were added after fulfilling the questionnaire. High scores indicate greater propensity to self-medicate

Click here to view


Part 4: The PHQ-4[16] validated in German is an ultra-short screening scale for the detection of anxiety and depressive disorders. It contains four questions regarding emotions and feelings and four answers to choose from: 0-not at all 1-some days, 2-more than half the days, 3-nearly every day. The added scores reflected the patients' depressive disorders. It yields a total score between 0 and 12 (scores: 0–2 normal, 3–5 mild, 6–8 moderate, and 9–12 severe depressive or anxiety disorder).

Statistical Methods: A two-tailed Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyze the data distribution. Nonparametric continuous data are presented by median and range and are analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U-test. The parametric data are presented by mean ± standard deviation and analyzed with the Student t-Test. Categorical data were compared with a Chi-square test and a Kruskal–Wallis test. The results were considered significant when P < 0.05. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS® Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

This Study has an Ethical Committee Approval: Swissethics ID 2019-01392 and is in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.


  Results Top


From 1022 patients with small arthroscopic shoulder operations, we were able to identify twenty-two patients with a clear diagnosis of an FS. Two of these refused to participate in the study for no specific reason. Demographic data of both groups (n = 20) were comparable. The FS group deferred slightly by the number of women (15 vs. 14 in control group) and patients with diabetes (2 vs. 1). Age (58.5 vs. 60.5 years; P = 0.371), BMI (25.2 vs. 23.1; P = 0.357), and time (in months) from operation (51.1 vs. 42.2; P = 0.153) were comparable [Table 2].
Table 2: Results Overview-Depending on distribution, results were presented by using median and Range or total-mean and SD

Click here to view


Restriction in daily activity was twice as long in the FS group then in the control group (11.1 vs 6.5 months, P = 0.009). The inability to work was 2.88 times longer in the FS-group compared to the control group (6.3 vs. 2.2 months, P = 0.003, see Tab. 2). Both patient groups were highly satisfied with the operation, with the mean subjective shoulder value (SSV) being 89% in the FS and 93% in the control group (see Tab. 2). Furthermore 15 of 20 patients with FS and 18 of the 20 patients in the control group would undergo the procedure again, which was also not significantly different (P = 0.212). The depression scale [PHQ-4 questionnaire, [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] showed no significant differences (P = 0.204) between the FS- and the control group.
Figure 1: PHQ-4 Depression-Scale FS Group, illustration of the score-distribution in patient-counts and %

Click here to view
Figure 2: PHQ-4 Depression-Scale Control Group, illustration of the score-distribution in patient-counts and %

Click here to view


The self-medication scale (9-45 points) showed a trend, but not significant (P = 0.094) toward a lower coherence to self-medication in the FS group (FS group: range 26-37, median 26.50; control group: range 17-40, median 29.5). In comparison to the control group, FS patients reported significantly more frequently that they had not taken painkillers as prescribed (P = 0.003).


  Discussion Top


Postoperative FS represents a significant complication even after small arthroscopic shoulder surgery. It is a cause of marked disability and has a profound effect on the patient's quality of life. Further, it has a relevant impact on healthcare system.[7] In the current study, presence of FS did prolong shoulder restriction by a factor 2 (11 months vs 6.5 months). This is remarkable, since small arthroscopic procedures are usually uneventful and a rapid recovery is usually expected both by the patient and the physician. Furthermore, the duration of disability to work was almost tripled.

The main finding of this study, is that patients who developed postoperative FS significantly more frequently reported they had not taken pain killers as prescribed. (P = 0.003). It might be well argued, that the—supposedly—reduced intake of painkillers had increased the rate of FSs. However, there is only weak evidence that NSAID alone prevent from a postoperative FS.[11],[17] Therefore, the high incidence may rather be attributed to the patient characteristics than to the supposedly reduced intake of painkillers. In any case, a simply asked question on the willingness to take medications helps to identify patients with a higher risk to develop a postoperative FS, even after a small arthroscopic intervention.

The “self-medication scale,” which to our knowledge is the only established score on coherence to self-medication shows the same trend, even if the result was not significant (P = 0.094). It may well be that this score is not specific enough or lost its value by the translation into German.

In contrast, depression had no or not a significant effect on the probability to develop postoperative FS. Using the PHQ-4[16] screening scale, we found no significant differences in terms of depression and anxiety between the two patient groups. However, this might be due to the small number of patients with a mild or moderate depression in both groups (FS-group (n = 4) and in the control group (n = 2)). A larger number of patients might have shown some effect, which would be in line with previous studies.

Ding et al.[18] found that the prevalence of depression or anxiety was significantly higher in patients with idiopathic FS (28.2% and 24.2%, respectively) compared to healthy controls (16.9% and 13.8%, respectively).

There is abundant literature demonstrating that psychological factors have a strong impact on functional outcome after shoulder surgery, or even be more relevant than structural changes.[8],[9] Of interest, Cuff et al.[19] found that a high preoperative subjective pain tolerance was a strong predictor for pain in patients after rotator cuff repair, i.e., patients who thought they could tolerate the most pain rated their pain the most disabling. However, in the current literature no attention has been drawn to the psychological factors being predictive for postoperative FS. This is the first report to correlate the incidence of postoperative FS with the patient's psychological characteristics, in particular the attitude toward intake of medication.

Of note, in the present study patient's retrospective view toward the arthroscopic surgery is merely positive; even patients with postoperative FS almost uniquely stated an improved quality of life, represented by a high subjective shoulder value (SSV) of 89% on the affected side. Fifteen of the 20 patients (75%) would have had the same operation performed again. In the control group with a mean SSV of 93%, 18 of the patients would have the same operation performed again, the differences not being significant.

Limitations: We are aware that this study has limitations. It is a retrospective study and there are flaws with the matching of the patients. However, the groups are almost equally distributed for gender, age, and even for the known risk factors for FS; differences in the frequency diabetes are only marginal. In addition, patients were interviewed after they had gone through the operative procedure and may have a different psychological condition than before the operation. However, it is reasonable to state that the postoperative coherence to self-medication has been reported accurately by the patients or has even not changed.

Patients with postoperative FS showed a significantly prolonged rehabilitation and work incapacity, although SSV and satisfaction with the postoperative result were high

Patients with unwillingness to take medications are at significant risk to develop a postoperative FS. Therefore, patients with a critical attitude toward medications should be strongly recommended to take the NSAID postoperatively and should be followed up more intensively to initiate timely therapeutic steps. Depression measured by the PHQ-4 did not increase the risk for postoperative FS.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Neviaser AS, Neviaser RJ. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:536-42.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Weber SC, Abrams JS, Nottage WM. Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy 2002;18(Suppl 1):88-95.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Werner BC, Pehlivan HC, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, et al. Increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic compared with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 2014;30:1075-84.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
White D, Choi H, Peloquin C, Zhu Y, Zhang Y. Secular trend of adhesive capsulitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:1571–5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zuckerman JD, Rokito A. Frozen shoulder: A consensus definition. Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:322-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Evans JP, Guyver PM, Smith CD. Frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures: What is the risk? Bone Joint J 2015;97:963-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bouaicha S, Wieser K, Kriechling P, Scholz-Odermatt SM. A large-scale assessment of the healthcare burden of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint. Swiss Med Wkly 2020;150:w20188. doi: 10.4414/smw. 2020.20188.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Gil JA, Goodman AD, Mulcahey MK. Psychological factors affecting outcomes after elective shoulder surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018;26:e98-104.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ravindra A, Barlow JD, Jones GL, Bishop JY. A prospective evaluation of predictors of pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Psychosocial factors have a stronger association than structural factors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:1824-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
[dataset] WHO's cancer pain ladder for adults. Available online. Available from: https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en/. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 05].   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lee PN, Lee M, Haq AM, Longton EB, Wright V. Peri- arthritis of the shoulder. Trial of treatments investigated by multivariate analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 1974;33:116-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rangan A, Goodchild L, Gibson J, Brownson P, Thomas M, Rees J, et al. Frozen shoulder. Shoulder Elbow 2015;7:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The Rand 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993;2:217–27.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:717-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
James DH, French DP. The development of the Self Medicating Scale (SMS): A scale to measure people's beliefs about self medication. Pharm World Sci 2008;30:794-800.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Löwe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics 2009;50:613–21.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Favejee MM, Huisstede BM, Koes BW. Frozen shoulder: The effectiveness of conservative and surgical interventions -- Systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:49-56.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Ding H, Tang Y, Xue Y, Yang Z, Li Z, He D, et al. A report on the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with frozen shoulder and their relations to disease status. Psychol Health Med 2014;19:730-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cuff DJ, O'Brien KC, Pupello DR, Santoni BG. Evaluation of factors affecting acute postoperative pain levels after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2016;32:1231-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed86    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded19    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]